Charlie or Charles Johnson

Tentang saya: theodicean atheist- if innocent and perhaps fairly devout people get harmed here, they were abandoned in their time of need, that disproves a protecting God, to think that God only applies to an afterlife and not life also, such as "he who believes in me shall never suffer," means you would accept a supreme being who is AWOL from life and only offers you a promissory note to pay you with protection when you pass on even though you needed protection now such as the protection given to big dicks, so what could exist as an alternative for a sexual life now and one in an afterlife? why not live in Naughtyngham? it's naughty and completely harmless if disease control is included, and satisfies normal male testosterone libido needs with orgasm releases, instead of reading a bible there you would read a tit mag, I read a fiction article in a national men's mag I purchased at a gas station where tit mags are commonly sold in the early 70's that said "I dig dope, and I dig sex," and read one that said "Big dicks are prime," a quote from a female pornstar being interviewed named Beverly Morris, the part of a bible that says "he who looks on a woman with lust commits adultery of the heart" is what's called in psychology as a psychological unrealistic demand on males because they have testosterone in them, and if followed would prevent males from ever getting attracted enough to have sex with females, perhaps becoming celibate, which would be impossible if they have a healthy quantity of testosterone in them, also a bible is not a tit mag thus should be disregarded, a bible would say that if a male whistles at a female walking on a sidewalk that he is a sinner, yet the females dig it, when a bible was developed, testosterone had not been discovered yet, also the part that says "he who looks on a woman with lust commits adultery of the heart" is written to apply to women, not only to married women since it says "a woman" and not "a married woman," so to not look at any woman with lust did not know about serum testosterone thus cannot be applied to the modern world, another part of a bible says to not eat too much honey, but it had no idea that eating too much honey would cause diabetes, so a bible was not informed enough to educate people, it was a stone age creation that had a .00 reliability coefficient of proving itself over time which is called reliability in psychological testing, meaning a creation tested 100 times was reliable for 100 times and would have a reliability coefficient of .99, if a .00 reliability coefficient then it was reliable zero times, .00, in this bible case from 2000 year ago until now, as opposed to validity and validity coefficients, which are something actually proving something, a bible back then also had a .00 validity coefficient since it did not know about testosterone and diabetes, it tried to prove something it knew nothing about, neolithic-like